8.6.10

Iran Sanctions: corporate prestidigitation





Nigel Howard Malpass
Having lived and worked in Ramsey for 20 years I believe that
I have that local understanding. For over ten of those years I
was the Managing Director of an Isle of Man based
International group of companies dealing daily with both local
and global issues.


Nigel Malpass
10 Clifton Drive
Ramsey
Isle of Man
IM8 3ND
Telephone: 813774 / 814913 / 491234
Email: nigel.malpass@liberalvannin.org

Nigel Howard Malpass of 10, Clifton Drive,
Ramsey. International Marine Consultant

Shallon Overseas Limited


The Isle of Man company, Shallon, is part of a network set up with the help of Nigel Howard Malpass, a British shipping consultant who serves on the boards of Smart Day and companies connected to 43 other ships previously registered to Irisl, records show.

And the shares of many of those companies are held by yet another Isle of Man company, Woking Limited, which records show is wholly owned by none other than Irisl.

“I did used to be involved with Irisl,” Mr. Malpass said in a telephone interview, adding that while he had set up companies at the company’s behest, he had since “disassociated” himself.

NYTimes
interactive graph

Pirates: insurance policies to say negotiators



The report also states that skilled ransom negotiators can help to keep risk to life and vessels, as well as ransom payments, to a minimum. Where ship owners intend to pay a ransom to recover their vessel and crew, and recommends that they use experienced and effective ransom negotiators. Where insurance policies do not already insist on experienced negotiators, they should do so.
The pirates were largely based around three clans, which tended to have their own "pirate companies". They left from numerous pirate ports, including coves and harbors along the 3,000 km-long coast. They brought seized ships back to a central location, where they maintained the security of the ships and conducted ransom negotiations
A significant number of Somali pirates are organized in clan-based sophisticated criminal networks. However the method of attack has remained basic. Ironically, it is a measure of the success of Atalanta and other international forces in the Gulf of Aden that pirates have been forced to operate further offshore in the Indian Ocean. This increases the risk-to-reward ratio for the pirates as they have to use mother ships which are more easily identified by surveillance.


Hostage taking and ransoms

53. Rear Admiral Hudson [Rear Admiral Peter Hudson CBE] said that the piracy of ships for ransom had generated around $80 million in 2009. Generally, hostages had been well treated notwithstanding the psychological impact. Tracing where the money went was a key part of the overall assault on piracy but he did not believe there were any direct links between terrorist organisations such as Al-Qaeda and piracy (Q 108). We understand that it is very difficult to ascertain the ultimate destination of proceeds of piracy. Although the Government have so far found no evidence of any operational or organisational link between piracy and terrorism,[14] there must be a danger of such links.

54. Lord Malloch-Brown (then FCO Minister) acknowledged the reality that ransom payments were made by ship owners to save the life of their crews, and confirmed that such payments were not illegal under international law. However, the Government would not endorse, condone or participate in such a transaction, in line with the common EU position (QQ 79-80).

55. Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead confirmed that the payment of ransoms was not a criminal offence under UK law; the Government's position was that such payments should be discouraged as they would only exacerbate the piracy problem[15]. Mr Holtby stated that once a ransom was received by pirates it became criminal proceeds which could then technically be recovered (Q 340).

56. The insurance industry confirmed that the payment of a ransom was insurable and it was not illegal to insure such a payment[16] (Croom-Johnson Q 278). The FCO told us that the US had recently suggested that pirate individuals should be designated under the UN anti-terror sanctions regime, which could require States to freeze funds and financial assets associated with an individual. They noted the reported concerns of the shipping industry that such a move might render the payment of ransoms more complicated and thus potentially endanger the lives of crews (Q 340).

57. We support the status quo whereby the payment of ransom to pirates is not a criminal offence under United Kingdom law. We recommend that the Government continue to monitor the potential risks of monies reaching terrorists.

58. We understand that skilled ransom negotiators can help to keep risk to life and vessels, as well as ransom payments, to a minimum. Where ship owners intend to pay a ransom to recover their vessel and crew, we recommend that they use experienced and effective ransom negotiators. Where insurance policies do not already insist on experienced negotiators, they should do so.
Combating Somali Piracy: the EU's Naval Operation Atalanta - European Union Committee, by Sub-Committee C (Foreign Affairs, Defence and Development)

7.6.10

RIM: drifting in heavy seas, pirates lurk





The Spanish Ministry of defense states:"The ship 'RIM', with North Korean flag, was abducted on 3 February and was anchored near Garacaad, on the coast of Somalia. His crew got today to regain control of the ship and fled due south, while being pursued by another ship hijacked by pirates. The frigate 'Victoria', on the instructions of the commander of the operation 'Atalanta' against piracy in the Indian Ocean, on June 3 went to meet a North Korean merchant ship whose crew had managed to break free from their captors.

On being informed of the facts, the commander of the operation 'Atalanta' ordered the frigate 'Victoria', which was about 100 miles and was the ship closest to the 'RIM', go at full speed to provide relief to a merchant .The frigate 'Victoria' sent a helicopter to link with the crew of 'RIM' and learn about the internal situation of the staff.

The helicopter remained in the vicinity of the North Korean merchant to protect, to the attempt by pirates kidnap again using another of the hijacked ships.[VOC Daisy] . The pirates gave up their attitude to the warnings thrown from the Spanish helicopter . -Google translation, some editing.

Dutch Ministry of Defense states:
The amphibious transport ship Hr. Ms. Johan de Witt has provided emergency assistance to the crew of the North Korean merchant vessel MV-RIM. The hijacked ship was for about four months off Garacad, the Somali pirates camp, until the crew last week single-handedly managed to get rid of her enemies and head for open sea.. 3 crew members were injured by this action, and have been taken onboard the Johan de Witt for care.


The merchant ship was in very poor condition so the engines dropped after a short time. . . The rudderless ship floating constituted no danger to shipping.
. Ms. Johan de Witt was ordered to assist, mainly because there are 2 hospital onboard. A Spanish helicopter brought a crew member with a gunshot wound aboard the Johan de Witt for immediate surgery .

. Technicians of the Dutch naval vessel noted aboard the RIM that the ship is not beyond repair, the electricity had gone, like the navigation. The poor condition of the ship combined with the high seas and wind caused the ship to take on water , resulted in the captain of the RIM to order his crew abandon the ship. Operational headquarters of Operation Atalanta was informed.
The three injured have been discharged from the hospital and have been instructed to care for their injuries. Soon they landed in Djibouti.

The merchant vessel is monitored by the operational headquarters of Atlanta so as not to endanger shipping. -Google translation, some editing.
here here

5.6.10

RIM: What cargo? What destination?



The crew of MV RIM abandoned the ship on the request of the master June 5. EU NAVFOR warship Johan de Witt was close to the position and engaged in the rescue. The mysteries surrounding the MV Rim and The rumours surrounding the ownership and cargo of the 4,800 tonne freighter persist. Although listed as Libyan owned the uninsured vessel was said to have been purchased by North Korea. If the cargo is really only clay, as stated by the owner - a 3 million dollar ransom wouldn't make sense.

Seized February 02, 2010. The North-Korean-flagged, Libyan owned general cargo vessel MV RIM was captured - en route from Eritrea to presumably Yemen - in the north-western Gulf of Aden just south of the Yemeni coast on 2nd February 2009 . Though a coalition ship USS PORTER that works closely with EU NAVFOR and a helicopter from USS FARRAGUT, both of CMF CTF 151, confirmed that the RIM had been hijacked, EU NAVFOR headquarters first declined to confirm the report on 2nd to Somalia's anti-piracy envoy - only to report it then a day later.
EU NAVFOR then stated that the vessel was sea-jacked to the north of the Internationally Recommended Transit Corridor (IRTC), was not registered with MSC HOA and has had no communications with UKMTO, the British operation in Bahrain.
The relatively small coastal cargo ship of 4,800 tonnes is still listed in the ship registers as being owned by White Sea Shipping of Tripoli in Libya, while in reality it was allegedly sold now to another company for her last cargo trip with a load of clay and with a final destination at the scrapyards in India.
Her crew comprises at the moment of 10 sailors - all of Syrian nationality. An actual crew-list has now been provided. The vessel and crew are neither covered by an ITF Agreement nor an appropriate insurance.
The ship was first commandeered to the Somali Gulf of Aden coast near LasKorey where it encountered Puntland forces and the pirates exchanged fire with them. Then it sailed around the tip of the very Horn of Africa to Garacad on the Indian Ocean side.
The vessel has been moved from Garacad - because local elders protested - to Kulub, where it is held 5.3 nm off the shore at the North-Eastern Indian Ocean coast of Somalia. Negotiations between the pirates and the owners have commenced, while nosy naval vessels nearby drew in one case fire from the pirates. Numerous sidelines opened by Somali brokers make the case difficult. The captors have threatened to kill the captain if their ransom demand- $3million - is not fulfilled. If rational, the reason for the high demand for a ship which is on her last leg to the scrapyards can only be found in the cargo, which - if really only clay, as stated by the owner - also wouldn't make sense.
The Syrian crew of MV RIM are now on board Johan de Witt and will be transferred to a safe port.

>>> What if the real cargo was discharged at Garacad? The crew "overcomes" pirates, sails away and abandons the vessel?

3.6.10

QSM Dubai: Captain killed as Puntland boards


Security forces in Somalia’s semi-autonomous northern region of Puntland June 3 freed a QSM Dubai, a Panama-flagged vessel seized by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden.

The pirates killed the Pakistani captain of the MV QSM Dubai during the clash, according to a Somalian government official.But most navies will not intervene after pirates are onboard a ship for fear of harming the hostages. "Hitherto, Somali pirates have merely treated hijackings as a business transaction and have been fairly consistent about not purposely harming anyone," said James Gosling, a London-based partner at Holman Fenwick Willan, who has advised ship owners in nearly 30 ransom negotiations off the Horn of Africa. "My hope is they will just continue as before ... But obviously we are very concerned about what impact the latest events will have." The QSM Dubai is beneficially-owned by Lebanese interests. A wrongful death action by the captain's heirs may have different consequences for this owner than for shipowners in western countries.

VOC Daisy: maneuvers Spanish helo, impedes








There were however, pirates in the vicinity who were attempting to impede the EU NAVFOR operation by utilising another hijacked vessel the MV VOC DAISY. When SPS VICTORIA’s helicopter approached 47,183dwt MV VOC DAISY she changed her course – no warning shots were fired.

It is believed that some of the pirates were killed during the incident; Rim (IMO: 7328554)Flag: Libya [LY] is now under the control of the Syrian crew.

VOC Daisy IMO: 9154555
Geared Bulk Carrier - They have cranes, derricks or conveyors that allow them to load or discharge cargo in ports without shore-based equipment.
Ex: Golden Daisy (2000)
DWT: 47,183
LOA: 185.73
Built: 1998. Oshima Shipbuilding Co Ltd

more

2.6.10

Rachel corrie: Irish FM Micheál Martin T.D.



Micheál Martin T.D.
“I again repeat my urgent call to the Israeli government to allow safe passage of the Irish owned vessel, the MV Rachel Corrie, which is still sailing towards Gaza to deliver its consignment of humanitarian aid. It is imperative that there should be no further confrontation or bloodshed arising from what has been all along a purely humanitarian mission by those involved in the Gaza flotilla. The Government will be maintaining close contact with the Israeli government on this issue in the coming days.”